12-16-2022, 11:31 PM
If that truly is the situation then it would breach right to repair laws would it not?
Perhaps if that’s what is going on you should do a follow up with the same RAM modules using the latest DSM update and call Synology out on their practice.
I went through a reddit thread which was after your video and in that thread many people were making claims their Synology NAS were operating on 7.1 with 16Gb and working.
When this process started I was on DSM 7.1 update 1 … post the installs I went to Update 3.
In the end the RAM has been returned to Amazon already. Yet, your information doesn’t fill me with confidence to try again. I may just try to procure a 2nd hand 4 Gb Synology RAM module.
Who is the original maker of Synology RAM? I read once they were Samsung module?
Kind regards,
EDIT - There is another thread on LTT which sates there whitelisting hard drives now as well. PLEASE call Synology out on this practice of blacklisting and whitelisting third party hardware.
Perhaps if that’s what is going on you should do a follow up with the same RAM modules using the latest DSM update and call Synology out on their practice.
I went through a reddit thread which was after your video and in that thread many people were making claims their Synology NAS were operating on 7.1 with 16Gb and working.
When this process started I was on DSM 7.1 update 1 … post the installs I went to Update 3.
In the end the RAM has been returned to Amazon already. Yet, your information doesn’t fill me with confidence to try again. I may just try to procure a 2nd hand 4 Gb Synology RAM module.
Who is the original maker of Synology RAM? I read once they were Samsung module?
Kind regards,
EDIT - There is another thread on LTT which sates there whitelisting hard drives now as well. PLEASE call Synology out on this practice of blacklisting and whitelisting third party hardware.