Yesterday, 12:02 PM
You’re absolutely right — Synology’s increasing restrictions around third-party hard drives have been frustrating for many users. While their systems (especially DSM) are still some of the best out there in terms of usability and stability, the locked-down drive compatibility can make things unnecessarily difficult and expensive.
You’re also not imagining it — the third-party compatibility list for newer NAS models like the DS923+ hasn’t been updated in quite a while, and many of the listed drives are hard to find or already discontinued in Europe. If you use drives not on the list, you’ll still be able to use the system, but you will likely get warning pop-ups and may miss out on full SMART data and drive health monitoring — which is obviously not ideal for peace of mind.
QNAP, as you mentioned, is far more open in that respect. The TS-473A and TS-673A are both solid choices. You’ll get more flexibility with drives and expansion, and both support ZFS via QuTS Hero if you’re interested in snapshot-heavy or more data-integrity-focused setups. The trade-off, of course, is that the interface and OS aren’t quite as polished as DSM — more powerful, but not as beginner-friendly.
Given your budget and capacity targets (14–16TB drives, NVMe caching), you’re right in the sweet spot for either brand. If DSM is a priority for you and you’re happy to put up with some alerts or go the Synology drive route, the DS923+ is still a great NAS. But if the restrictions become too limiting, the QNAP alternatives you’re considering are very capable — especially if you grow into heavier apps or VMs later on.
You’re also not imagining it — the third-party compatibility list for newer NAS models like the DS923+ hasn’t been updated in quite a while, and many of the listed drives are hard to find or already discontinued in Europe. If you use drives not on the list, you’ll still be able to use the system, but you will likely get warning pop-ups and may miss out on full SMART data and drive health monitoring — which is obviously not ideal for peace of mind.
QNAP, as you mentioned, is far more open in that respect. The TS-473A and TS-673A are both solid choices. You’ll get more flexibility with drives and expansion, and both support ZFS via QuTS Hero if you’re interested in snapshot-heavy or more data-integrity-focused setups. The trade-off, of course, is that the interface and OS aren’t quite as polished as DSM — more powerful, but not as beginner-friendly.
Given your budget and capacity targets (14–16TB drives, NVMe caching), you’re right in the sweet spot for either brand. If DSM is a priority for you and you’re happy to put up with some alerts or go the Synology drive route, the DS923+ is still a great NAS. But if the restrictions become too limiting, the QNAP alternatives you’re considering are very capable — especially if you grow into heavier apps or VMs later on.