Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Low power surveillance NAS project challenge

#2
You've got a really interesting project on your hands, and it's clear you've thought through many of the details. Given Jim’s "frugal" nature and the off-grid setup, the goal is to find a low-cost, low-power solution that can still reliably capture and sync surveillance footage. Let's go over some potential solutions that might fit your needs:

1. Low-Power NAS Alternatives:
Raspberry Pi 4 or 5: Although you’re concerned about the learning curve, a Raspberry Pi running Ubuntu Server or Raspberry Pi OS is actually quite capable of handling Tailscale, Syncthing, and basic file storage. The community support for Raspberry Pi is excellent, and you’ll find plenty of tutorials to guide you through the setup. The power consumption is minimal, especially if you use an SSD via USB rather than an HDD.
Pros: Low cost, low power consumption, and flexible software options.
Cons: Learning curve, limited storage expansion.
ZimaBoard: This is a more powerful alternative to the Raspberry Pi and is designed as a single-board computer for DIY NAS setups. It runs Linux-based OSes and can easily handle Tailscale and Syncthing. It’s slightly more expensive but still within a reasonable budget.
Pros: More powerful than Raspberry Pi, still low power, and supports more robust NAS functionalities.
Cons: Slightly higher cost, not as widely supported as Raspberry Pi.
Odroid HC4: This is another single-board computer designed for low-power NAS setups. It has dual SATA ports, making it easier to connect drives directly. It’s more powerful than a Raspberry Pi and should comfortably handle the software you need.
Pros: Dual SATA for direct HDD/SSD connection, low power, and reasonable cost.
Cons: Limited availability and community support compared to Raspberry Pi.
2. NAS Setup and Configuration:
Tailscale: Once you’ve selected the device, installing Tailscale on any of the above options should be straightforward. Tailscale works well on Linux, so whether you choose Ubuntu on a Pi, ZimaBoard, or Odroid, you’ll have no trouble setting it up.
Syncthing: Syncthing will work smoothly on any Linux-based system. It’s efficient in terms of power usage and will keep your data synced back to your NAS in Vancouver without clogging the WiFi too much.
3. Power Considerations:
Power Efficiency: All the recommended options above are highly power-efficient, which is ideal given the off-grid solar setup. Using SSDs rather than HDDs will further reduce power consumption, as SSDs draw less power and generate less heat, meaning fans (if any) will work less.
Fanless Designs: If noise and power consumption are big concerns, going with a fanless design like the Odroid HC4 could be beneficial. This way, the only power draw is from the board and the connected drives.
4. Storage Options:
SSD vs. SD Card: While SD cards are extremely low power, they might not offer the durability or capacity needed for constant write operations like video recording. A 1TB SSD connected via USB or SATA is a more reliable option and still within the low-power budget.
Micro-SD for OS: If you go the Raspberry Pi route, using a micro-SD card for the OS and an external SSD for storage could be a good balance. For other boards, booting from SSD directly would be ideal.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Low power surveillance NAS project challenge - by ed - 08-16-2024, 11:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)