Serverrack nas

[Enquiries]

Hello, I have been trying to figure out which nas to buy and would appreciate your advice!
I would like a nas to put in my serverrack to be able to connect it to my homenetwork. It would mainly serve as storage for videofiles and I would like to stream it to different devices in my home like my computer or Apple TV. My videolibrary contains many 4k blu-ray rips zo I would need a decent speed. I would like it be accesible through Windows file explorer. I was looking in to the QNAP TS-435XeU-4G or the Synology RS822+ nas but I am not sure it would be wise to buy any of these two or if it’s better to buy something else. Please note that I have enough space to even put a non rackmountable nas in my serverrack so if you would prefer to recommend one of those, it’s fine too. I just want the best solution!
Thank you in advance!

[ed]

1. QNAP TS-435XeU-4G vs Synology RS822+
Both the QNAP TS-435XeU-4G and Synology RS822+ are excellent choices, but for 4K streaming and general performance, you might want to consider a few factors:

QNAP TS-435XeU-4G: This rackmount NAS is compact and comes with a quad-core processor, making it suitable for 4K Blu-ray rips, but it lacks hardware transcoding which could be a limitation for certain media formats.
Synology RS822+: This model is also a good option with a strong reputation for ease of use. It has better software support, especially for media streaming and remote access, and is also equipped with an Intel processor that can handle multiple streams.
2. Non-Rackmountable NAS Option
Since you have the space to go for a non-rackmountable NAS, you could also consider the following:

Synology DS923+: This is a great choice for media streaming. It has an Intel Celeron processor with hardware transcoding capabilities, which will make streaming 4K content much smoother. It supports up to 4 drives, so you can easily scale up to your 40TB requirement. Its DSM operating system is user-friendly and supports Windows File Explorer access via SMB.

QNAP TS-464: If you want more flexibility, this is another option worth considering. The TS-464 comes with 4 bays, an Intel Celeron processor, and 4GB RAM (expandable), providing good performance for 4K streaming. Like the Synology model, it supports Windows File Explorer access via SMB and also includes the QNAP QTS software, which is excellent for file management and streaming.

Key Points:
4K Streaming: Both the Synology DS923+ and QNAP TS-464 will provide excellent performance for streaming 4K Blu-ray rips.
Ease of Use: Synology's DSM is typically considered more user-friendly, while QNAP's QTS is a bit more feature-packed but can be more complex.
File Access: Both Synology and QNAP support Windows File Explorer access, so file management won't be an issue.
With your budget of around $1000 for the NAS (excluding HDDs), either of these non-rackmountable options (Synology DS923+ or QNAP TS-464) would likely be your best bet for a future-proof solution that balances performance and ease of use for media streaming.