ASK NC

Full Version: Archive NAS
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
This NAS would be located on our network in another building to provide an archive location for mostly video files. I will be manually backing up my edit SSD's (16TB) at least weekly. A video server on our network will also use the NAS as an archive location and will periodically backup old videos automatically. Our network is currently 1GbE but I could see it being useful to have the ability to move this NAS closer to my edit station and potentially edit directly off it with a dedicated 10GbE port. If that increases the cost significantly though, I would probably prefer to stick to something that is solely used for archive purposes and spend the money on that. But if it fits in the budget of $3100, it might be useful to include.

We have mainly stuck to Synology in the past, although if there is a significant benefit to going with another manufacturer, we would be open to it.
Based on your use case, the Synology DS1522+ would be a great option for your needs. It has plenty of storage capacity for your video files and is expandable if you need more in the future. With a 10GbE port, you can easily move large video files back and forth between the NAS and your editing station.

If you're concerned about the cost of a dedicated 10GbE port, you can consider using a switch with 10GbE ports instead. This way, you can connect multiple devices to the switch and take advantage of the faster speeds without having to pay for a dedicated port on each device.

As for other manufacturers, there are certainly other options out there, but Synology has a good reputation for their NAS products and their user-friendly interface. Sticking with a brand you're familiar with can also make it easier to manage and maintain your network.