Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

New NAS - 920+ or 923+ ??

#1
Lightbulb 
Hi all 

I am looking for a NAS as a home user and am having a debate on what NAS system to buy. 
I am split between Synology and QNAP - though the former seems (from what I've read around the subject of NAS') to be a bit more secure and advanced in the sense of photo AI and photo app (an app which backs up to the NAS when out and about etc) ...
I thought about the 920+ as it has integrated graphics but as its 3 years old, I thought about QNAPP 464 model because it's newer and seems to have better hardware -- but because of the above and in my probably very amateurish understanding that QNAP isn't 'as good' or 'well-rounded' as Synology I explored the 923+ ... however because of its lacks of integrated onboard graphics , it has put me off - though the upgradability of it (and it being newer) draws me to it .. therefore I am in a debate, 920+ or 923+...
I see on some threads and NAS compares videos that Plex Server (Which I'm not sure I would actually use) may struggle with demanding transcoding; therefore 920+ is better. that said; if I'm not going to use a media server - why not get the 923+ .... this is where I get more stuck .. I read another post which largely says providing your not going to stream video from the NAS to say a mobile while out and about , the 923+ would be find to 'stream' video at home? 

Another thing I'm not clear about; would the 923+ struggle with tasks like indexing and AI / facial recognition of photos or would be better?
does the 923+ having expandable ECC memory, the potential for higher LAN speeds and also SSD drive outweigh the dual-core AMD without integrated graphics ... I seem to think surely Synology wouldn't have a NAS that has such a chip set that would struggle / not perform with software that the very system is highly associated with, would they ?
Primarily I want a machine that is a backup of photos/videos etc and will sync my photos when out.

I have looked at hard drives; was thinking 4TB: Seagate ST4000NE001 IronwolfPro or Synology HAT5300-4T ...
Are Seagate brand and model a good choice, or would I notice much better improvement with Synology brand of HDD?

I have info overload ... any help would be gratefully received....
Reply
#2
Yes, if you do not stream movies outside your home then DS923+ is a better choice.
It supports 10GbE and has a faster NVMe cache/storage.
Qnap 64 series has a chip if you need this remote video streaming. Here is how to secure it https://nascompares.com/2022/10/21/qnap-...-your-nas/
AI face recognition will work the same on all NAS systems mentioned here.
Having faster CPU will improve LAN speeds. Faster 10gbe but no difference in 1GbE.
The best drives for a NAS is WD Red plus and Ironwolf.
Synology drives (toshiba relabeled) are enterprise type of drive. The performance will be similar to RED Pro and Ironwolf Pro drives. But no real tangible speed improvement. Only life expectancy.

I hope this helps.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)