TS-473A vs. DS-923+ - Printable Version +- ASK NC (https://ask.nascompares.com) +-- Forum: Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Before you buy Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: TS-473A vs. DS-923+ (/showthread.php?tid=8406) |
TS-473A vs. DS-923+ - Enquiries - 01-22-2023 Hi, do not have a NAS System yet so thinking about the QNAP TS-473A or the brand new Synology DS-923+ (both with 64-Bit x86). Price difference between both does not matter. After looking at your reviews you may prefer the new DS-923+ and the Synology system - quite a long review on youtube ;-) Because the TS-464 can handle max. 16 GB of RAM so is out of the scope. Looking for: Data storage with 2 x 4-6 TB as a RAID 1 no GPU transcoding needed (at the moment) Docker with: eg. influxDB, Grafana Snapshot function maybe Windows or Linux VM Do you think the QNAP is too old and there will be a refresh soon? ZFS vs. BTRFS GPU can be add later for QNAP 2,5 vs. 1 GbE 4-core vs. 2 core QuTS Hero vs. DSM 64 GB vs. 32 GB RAM Seems that QNAP is a bit more open for third party hardware (RAM, M2.SSD, etc.) add-ons? Synology allows their own M2.SSD only. What do you think? Thanks for a advice, Sebastian RE: TS-473A vs. DS-923+ - ed - 01-26-2023 I would recommend Synology for home use, as it offers a more stable operating system (DSM) and is generally considered to be more user-friendly. However, if you need faster performance for virtual machines, then an extra two CPU cores may help. In terms of file systems, BTRFS is a good choice for home use, as it is less resource demanding and more flexible than ZFS. Qnap has the advantage of being able to add a GPU, and its operating system (QTS) is more configurable for IT professionals. However, it is important to note that Synology offers more third-party compatibility and better reliability. In terms of network connectivity, 1 GbE and 2.5 GbE are not significantly different in terms of speed, but 10 GbE is a faster option. Additionally, more RAM may be useful if you plan to use the NAS for more demanding tasks. Overall, it's a trade-off between price and reliability. If you're looking for a more affordable option with some additional features and a bit more configurability, Qnap may be a good choice, but if you want a more stable and user-friendly solution, Synology is probably a better choice. |