![]() |
QNAP TS-464 vs TBS-h574TX depending on the SSD I can choose from - Printable Version +- ASK NC (https://ask.nascompares.com) +-- Forum: Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Before you buy Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: QNAP TS-464 vs TBS-h574TX depending on the SSD I can choose from (/showthread.php?tid=11929) |
QNAP TS-464 vs TBS-h574TX depending on the SSD I can choose from - Enquiries - 04-21-2025 I have to choose between the QNAP TS-464-8G with 4x Kingston DC600M 7.68TB or the TBS-h574TX-i5-16G with 5x WD Red SN700 4TB (or Samsung 990 Pro/WD_BLACK SN850X). My main use is 4K HDR Plex streaming, photo/video/personal file backups, and possibly some light video/photo editing in the future (but not sure). All my VMs are on my PC now, but I might want to run a BTC node on the NAS later (already running one on a Pi). I know the TBS is more future-proof with Thunderbolt and NVMe speed, but I don’t like being locked into only M.2 drives, with limited high-endurance options. The TS-464 feels more flexible (enterprise SATA SSDs, more raw capacity), but I’m worried it might feel outdated over 5+ years. Which setup is the smarter choice long-term, balancing future needs, endurance, speed, and flexibility? I know the TBS would be the smart choice but I am afraid on the SSD and low capacity, but the TS seems so much inferior in this case but way better with the SSDs and decent for my use. RE: QNAP TS-464 vs TBS-h574TX depending on the SSD I can choose from - ed - 04-24-2025 QNAP TS-464-8G + 4x Kingston DC600M 7.68TB (≈30.7TB usable) SATA-based, high-endurance enterprise SSDs RAID flexibility with 3.5"/2.5" bays Intel Celeron + 8GB RAM Upgradeable RAM + PCIe slot for future 10GbE/NIC/cache Pros: ✔️ Huge storage capacity (over 30TB usable) ✔️ Enterprise-grade endurance (DC600M = 1.3 DWPD) ✔️ Lower cost per TB long-term ✔️ Quiet with SSDs, flexible upgrades Cons: ❌ Slower IOPS compared to NVMe ❌ CPU isn’t great for heavy containers/VMs down the road ❌ SATA bottleneck if you expand your workload TBS-h574TX-i5-16G + 5x WD Red SN700 4TB / Samsung 990 Pro / SN850X (≈18-20TB usable) All NVMe M.2 storage – blazing fast Thunderbolt 4, USB4, HDMI, 2.5GbE Intel Core i5 (12th Gen) + 16GB DDR5 RAM Designed for content creators + speed junkies Pros: ✔️ Insane performance – great for 4K Plex, editing, and VMs ✔️ Very future-proof I/O and compute ✔️ Thunderbolt 4 & NVMe = crazy fast transfers ✔️ Smaller, cooler, whisper quiet Cons: ❌ Stuck with M.2 NVMe only – no cheap expansion ❌ High-endurance M.2 SSDs are limited and expensive ❌ Max capacity currently limited (~18–20TB usable) ❌ No 3.5" bays for future storage ? The Core Dilemma: You're basically trading: TS-464 → Storage flexibility, endurance, capacity TBS-h574TX → Insane speed, modern hardware, sleek but tight on capacity ? Recommendation: Since you're focused on: 4K HDR Plex (needs some GPU + transcode muscle) Backups & photo/video editing (lightweight) Possible VMs or BTC node (but optional) Minimum 20TB usable Long-term usability (5+ years) I’d lean toward: ? ? TS-464 with the Kingston DC600Ms For your use case, endurance, capacity, and flexibility matter more. And you're not doing insane workloads to justify the NVMe-only setup just yet. If your usage grows, you can: Add a 10GbE card via PCIe Use NVMe caching with M.2 slots Expand backups externally Yes, the CPU isn’t future-proof forever, but it’ll handle Plex (with GPU), backups, light editing, and a BTC node just fine for several years. |