QNP ts251 - Printable Version +- ASK NC (https://ask.nascompares.com) +-- Forum: Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Before you buy Q&A (https://ask.nascompares.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: QNP ts251 (/showthread.php?tid=11098) |
QNP ts251 - Enquiries - 08-18-2024 Can you recommend a 2 bay NAS that doesn't suffer from the LPC bug. I bought a QNAP TS 251 and followed you excellent series on setting it up. Great channel and great content but I could use some advice. Regards Ron Webster RE: QNP ts251 - ed - 08-23-2024 Thanks for the kind words! I'm glad to hear you've been enjoying the content. Regarding your question, the LPC bug (Low Pin Count bug) can indeed be a concern with some NAS models, leading to boot issues over time. If you're looking to avoid this and still want a reliable 2-bay NAS, there are a few good options out there that don't suffer from this issue. Recommended 2-Bay NAS Options: Synology DS223+: This is a solid, reliable 2-bay NAS with a good track record for home use. It features a quad-core processor and 2GB of RAM (expandable), making it suitable for file storage, backups, and even some light media streaming. Synology's DSM (DiskStation Manager) software is user-friendly, and there are plenty of apps available for various needs, including multimedia, backup, and file management. QNAP TS-251D: Although you're looking to replace a QNAP due to the LPC bug, it's worth noting that not all QNAP models are affected. The TS-251D, for instance, is a newer model that has been well-received and doesn’t have the LPC bug issues. It offers a great balance of performance and price, with a dual-core Intel processor, HDMI output, and a PCIe slot for future upgrades. Asustor AS3302T: This is another great alternative that offers good performance for a 2-bay NAS. Asustor NAS devices are known for their solid hardware and extensive app support. The AS3302T comes with a quad-core processor, 2GB of RAM, and dual 2.5GbE ports, which is a nice step up in network performance compared to standard gigabit Ethernet. |